4.7 Article

C-peptide is a predictor of telomere shortening: A five-year longitudinal study

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.978747

关键词

telomere length; C-peptide; aging; metabolic; insulin resistance; predictor; telomere shortening

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This longitudinal study found that age, gender, and baseline C-peptide level were associated with telomere shortening, indicating the potential role of metabolic dysregulation in early aging. Further understanding and addressing high C-peptide levels are important for preventing premature aging.
AimRelative telomere length (RTL) predicts the development of many age-related diseases. Yet, few studies have evaluated their longitudinal effect on RTL. We investigated longitudinally the association between cardiometabolic risk factors and RTL. MethodsThis was a longitudinal study with a 5-year follow-up period, based on data collected in 2014 and 2019. Of 478 participants in 2014, 198 consented to be followed-up in 2019. The associations between RTL and risk factors were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA or simple linear regression as applicable. ResultsRTL was significantly shortened after 5 years (P<0.001). Older age (P=0.018) and gender (P=0.05) were significantly associated with shorter RTL at follow-up. Higher baseline C-peptide correlated with shorter RTL (P=0.04) and shortening of RTL (P=0.03) after 5 years. Multivariate linear regression including both age and gender revealed a significant trend for C-peptide and change in RTL after 5 years (P=0.04). Interestingly, there was a trend of shorter RTL at follow-up with diabetes, though the findings were not statistically significant. ConclusionsHigher C-peptide level contributes to telomere shortening over time, suggesting that metabolic dysregulation may play a role in early aging. Further understanding of this relationship and addressing high C-peptide levels can be important to prevent premature aging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据