3.8 Proceedings Paper

1109Metaverse Native Communication: A Blockchain and Spectrum Prospective

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICCWORKSHOPS53468.2022.9814538

关键词

Metaverse; Meta-native; Communications; Distributed; Ledger Technology; Blockchain.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article introduces the concept of the Metaverse and its differences from the real world. It proposes a blockchain-based solution for anonymous communication and digital identity verification within the Metaverse. The article also discusses the allocation of designated spectrum to facilitate access to the Metaverse.
Metaverse depicts a vista of constructing a virtual environment parallel to the real world so people can communicate with others and objects through digital entities. In the real world, communication relies on identities and addresses that are recognized by authorities, no matter the link is established via post, email, mobile phone, or landline. Metaverse, however, is different from the real world, which requires a single identity belongs to the individual. This identity can be an encrypted virtual address in the metaverse but no one can trace or verify it. In order to achieve such addresses to hide individuals in the metaverse, remapping the virtual address to the individual's identity and a specific spectrum to support the address-based communication for the metaverse are needed. Therefore, metaverse native or meta-native communications based on blockchain could be a promising solution to directly connect entities with their native encrypted addresses that gets rid of the existing network services based on IP, cellular, HTTP, etc. This paper proposes a vision of blockchain, encrypted address and address-based access model for all users, devices, services, etc. to contribute to the metaverse. Furthermore, the allocation architecture of a designated spectrum for the metaverse is proposed to remove the barrier to access to the metaverse/blockchain in response to the initiatives of metaverse and decentralized Internet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据