期刊
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES
卷 22, 期 9, 页码 3063-3082出版社
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/nhess-22-3063-2022
关键词
-
资金
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek [FWO-G0C8918N]
- KU Leuven [C14/16/045]
- FWO [1512817N]
- Flemish Government
This study assesses global landslide susceptibility using global satellite soil moisture observations. The study finds that global landslide susceptibility estimation contains uncertainty due to errors in the data, spatial mismatch, and generalizations in the model. To address the uncertainty, the study combines methods from the landslide community and meteorological modeling to create an ensemble of global landslide susceptibility maps. The study also perturbs the predictor variables to account for other uncertainty sources. The results show that including a topography-dependent perturbation improves the reliability of the uncertainty estimates.
This study assesses global landslide susceptibility (LSS) at the coarse 36 km spatial resolution of global satellite soil moisture observations to prepare for a subsequent combination of a global LSS map with dynamic satellite-based soil moisture estimates for landslide modeling. Global LSS estimation contains uncertainty, arising from errors in the underlying data, the spatial mismatch between landslide events and predictor information, and large-scale LSS model generalizations. For a reliable uncertainty assessment, this study combines methods from the landslide community with common practices in meteorological modeling to create an ensemble of global LSS maps. The predictive LSS models are obtained from a mixed effects logistic regression, associating hydrologically triggered landslide data from the Global Landslide Catalog (GLC) with predictor variables describing the landscape. The latter are taken from the Catchment land surface modeling system (including input parameters of soil (hydrological) properties and resulting climatological statistics of water budget estimates), as well as geomorphological and lithological data. Road network density is introduced as a random effect to mitigate potential landslide inventory bias. We use a blocked random cross validation to assess the model uncertainty that propagates into the LSS maps. To account for other uncertainty sources, such as input uncertainty, we also perturb the predictor variables and obtain an ensemble of LSS maps. The perturbations are optimized so that the total predicted uncertainty fits the observed discrepancy between the ensemble average LSS and the landslide presence or absence from the GLC. We find that the most reliable total uncertainty estimates are obtained through the inclusion of a topography-dependent perturbation between 15% and 20% to the predictor variables. The areas with the largest LSS uncertainty coincide with moderate ensemble average LSS, because of the asymptotic nature of the LSS model. The spatial patterns of the average LSS agree well with previous global studies and yield areas under the receiver operating characteristic between 0.84 and 0.92 for independent regional to continental landslide inventories.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据