3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Low-Cost In-situ System for Continuous Multi-Person Fever Screening

出版社

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/IPSN54338.2022.00009

关键词

-

资金

  1. Columbia Engineering under the Technology Innovations for Urban Living in the Face of COVID-19 grant
  2. National Science Foundation [CNS-1704899, CNS-1815274, CNS-11943396, CNS-1837022]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SIFTER is a low-cost system based on a RGB-thermal camera for continuous fever screening of multiple people, significantly improving screening throughput while minimizing disruption to normal activities. It can achieve 100% true positive rate with 22.5% false positive rate without requiring any human interaction, greatly outperforming the baseline.
With the recent societal impact of COVID-19, companies and government agencies alike have turned to thermal camera based skin temperature sensing technology to help screen for fever. However, the cost and deployment restrictions limit the wide use of these thermal sensing technologies. In this work, we present SIFTER, a low-cost system based on a RGB-thermal camera for continuous fever screening of multiple people. This system detects and tracks heads in the RGB and thermal domains and constructs thermal heat map models for each tracked person, and classifies people as having or not having fever. SIFTER can obtain key temperature features of heads in-situ at a distance and produce fever screening predictions in real-time, significantly improving screening throughput while minimizing disruption to normal activities. In our clinic deployment, SIFTER measurement error is within 0.4 degrees F at 2 meters and around 0.6 degrees F at 3.5 meters. In comparison, most infrared thermal scanners on the market costing several thousand dollars have around 1 degrees F measurement error measured within 0.5 meters.SIFTER can achieve 100% true positive rate with 22.5% false positive rate without requiring any human interaction, greatly outperforming our baseline [1], which sees a false positive rate of 78.5%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据