4.0 Article

Tolerance and Cadmium (Cd) Immobilization by Native Bacteria Isolated in Cocoa Soils with Increased Metal Content

期刊

MICROBIOLOGY RESEARCH
卷 13, 期 3, 页码 556-573

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microbiolres13030039

关键词

bacteria; native; soil; cacao; Cd; TEM; FT-IR

资金

  1. Compania Nacional de Chocolates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, twelve cadmium-tolerant bacteria were isolated from soils of cocoa farms in the Colombian Andes and their ability to tolerate and immobilize cadmium was tested. The results showed that these bacteria could deform their cell morphologies and interact with cadmium through biosorption and bioaccumulation. In addition, the presence of certain bacterial strains could prevent the increase of cadmium concentration in roots, indicating a potential for cadmium immobilization in soil.
Twelve cadmium native bacteria previously isolated in soils of cocoa farms located in the western Colombian Andes (Santander), and tolerant to 2500 mu M CdCl2 (120 mg Cd/L), were chosen in order to test their tolerance and Cd immobilization using liquid culture medium (Nutritive broth) at different concentrations of heavy metals. Furthermore, in the greenhouse experiments, the strains Exiguobacterium sp. (11-4A), Klebsiella variicola sp. (18-4B), and Enterobacter sp. (29-4B) were applied in combined treatments using CCN51 cacao genotype seeds grown in soil with different concentrations of Cd. All bacterial strains' cell morphologies were deformed in TEM pictures, which also identified six strain interactions with biosorption and four strain capacities for bioaccumulation; FT-IR suggested that the amide, carbonyl, hydroxyl, ethyl, and phosphate groups on the bacteria biomass were the main Cd binding sites. In the pot experiments, the concentration of Cd was distributed throughout the cacao plant, but certain degrees of immobilization of Cd can occur in soil to prevent an increase in this level in roots with the presence of Klebsiella sp.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据