4.5 Article

The ecosystem services framework in archaeology (and vice versa)

期刊

PEOPLE AND NATURE
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 1450-1460

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pan3.10395

关键词

archaeology; ecology; economics; ecosystem services; heritage landscapes

资金

  1. Israel Ministry of Science and Technology support of the Dead Sea and Arava Science Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Economics, ecology, and archaeology, while studying different aspects of resource utilization, have limited dialogue among them. However, ecosystem services (ES) can serve as a theoretical framework that links all three disciplines and can further evolve into a unified superdiscipline, providing new practical tools and resolving theoretical issues.
Economics, ecology and archaeology study various aspects of resource utilisation and mobilisation, differing in the studied systems, objects and currencies. However, the three disciplines have developed mostly independently, resulting in limited dialogue among them. Emergent fields such as ecological economics and environmental archaeology are now linking the three disciplines and promoting dialogue among them, but a theoretical framework that links all three disciplines at once is missing. I propose that ecosystem services (ES) can serve as such a theoretical framework. Moreover, after an ES-centred framework establishes, it will be capable of further evolving - independently of ES-into a unified superdiscipline, relieving boundaries among disciplines. To demonstrate this potential, I present some examples of archaeology-ES linkages, relating to the past, present and future. I show, in general, how archaeology studies past ES and informs us on current ES, as well as how ES benefit archaeological practice. Thus, I demonstrate the strong interface between archaeology and ES, and how it can promote the dialogue among the three disciplines, provide them with new practical tools, and resolve theoretical issues as the sustainability of ancient societies and anthropocentricity and monetisation of ES. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据