4.6 Article

Enhancement of fluorescence and photostability of luminescent radicals by quadruple addition of phenyl groups

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 10, 期 40, 页码 15028-15034

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc03132a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ms Yoshiko Nishikawa and Ms Mieko Yamagaki for HRMS (MALDI-TOF MS) conducted in NAIST
  2. Nanotechnology Platform Program Molecules and Material Synthesis of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [JPMXP09S21NR0009.]
  3. MIUR [PRIN2017 BOOSTER (2017YXX8AZ)]
  4. Cooperative Research by Institute for Molecular Science [22IMS1222]
  5. CREST program of the Japan Science and Technology Agency [JPMJCR17N2]
  6. JSPS KAKENHI [JP20H02759]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, quadruple addition of phenyl groups to a diphenylpyridylmethane skeleton was achieved, leading to the synthesis of a radical with superior luminescence properties. Further modifications with different functional groups resulted in the isolation of other compounds. These radicals not only exhibited excellent fluorescence properties, but also showed improved photostability.
Quadruple addition of phenyl groups to a diphenylpyridylmethane skeleton was achieved. The derived (3,5-difluoro-4-pyridyl)bis(2,6-dichloro-3,4-diphenylphenyl)methyl radical (Ph-4-F2PyBTM) displayed superior luminescence properties to the previously reported organic diphenylpyridylmethyl radicals in various organic solutions at room temperature, and it reached 33% photoluminescence quantum efficiency in PMMA film. With the introduction of methoxy groups, quadruple adduct (MeOPh)(4)-F2PyBTM and triple adduct (MeOPh)(3)-F2PyBTM were isolated. The excited state of these radicals showed an intramolecular charge transfer character and efficient fluorescence only in nonpolar solvents. The radicals retained not only persistency at the ground state but also durability under photoirradiation, with a 6 to 14 fold improved photostability with respect to the original PyBTM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据