4.1 Article

Phenotypic heterogeneity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in the protected nature park 'Palic' (Serbia)

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 1370-1377

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/ws.2016.061

关键词

biofilms; motility; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; pyocyanin; rhamnolipid production

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [TR 31080, TR34019]
  2. EU Commission project AREA [316004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a globally distributed environmental bacterium, which is also a significant opportunistic pathogen of humans, animals and plants. It is considered that wide distribution of this bacterium is connected with its most significant constitutive property to form biofilms, and that this multicellular mode of growth, predominant in nature, serves as a protective mechanism against unfavourable environmental conditions. The work presented here examines the phenotypic diversity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa environmental isolates with respect to biofilm production capacity under different environmental conditions (temperature, pH, NaCl), production of virulence factors, and motility. The purpose of this work is to present the production of two quorum sensing-regulated virulence factors (rhamnolipids and pyocyanin), explore different motility tests (swimming, swarming and twitching) and discover potential relationship between assessed phenotypic features. Obtained results delineate environmental conditions coinciding with biofilm production and suggest a high correlation between rhamnolipid production levels and biofilm formation. Rhamnolipids affect motility competence, yet only the flagellum-mediated swimming motility has significant impact on the biofilm formation potential. Although it is challenging to demarcate a definitive, clear correlation between parameters tested, rhamnolipid content appears to serve as a link between the tested phenotypic factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据