4.6 Article

A pencil graphite-based disposable device for electrochemical monitoring of sulfanilamide in honey and water samples

期刊

ANALYTICAL METHODS
卷 14, 期 39, 页码 3867-3874

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ay01137a

关键词

-

资金

  1. FAPEMIG (Research Support Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais) [APQ00042-2021]
  2. CNPq (National Council for Scientific and Technological Development) [302685/2019-7]
  3. CAPES (Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel) [001]
  4. PROPP/UFJF

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a simple, fast, and inexpensive method for manufacturing a disposable pencil graphite electrode. The electrode shows superior electroanalytical performance for the detection of sulfanilamide and exhibits good stability and accuracy in real samples.
The present paper reports a simple, fast, and inexpensive process of manufacturing a disposable pencil graphite electrode (PGE) from widely available materials, which showed a reproducibility of at least 7.5%. The electrode was compared to the commercial glassy carbon electrode (GCE) and showed superior electroanalytical performance for sulfanilamide (SFA) with approximately 3.9-fold higher current density. Additionally, a displacement of the oxidation peak from approximately 80 mV to more cathodic regions was observed. Therefore, a method based on square wave voltammetry (SWV) was developed for the determination of the antimicrobial SFA in honey and tap water samples using the proposed sensor. The optimized method presented good detectability (LOD = 2.37 mu mol L-1), with excellent precision and accuracy (relative standard deviation < 4.2%) and percent recovery from spiked samples ranging from 92 to 97%. In addition, the sensor did not suffer significant interference from sample matrix components and other commonly evaluated antimicrobials, which demonstrates the potential of these electrodes for implementation in routine analysis and quality control.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据