3.8 Review

Review of electrofuel feasibility-prospects for road, ocean, and air transport

期刊

PROGRESS IN ENERGY
卷 4, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2516-1083/ac8097

关键词

power-to-fuels; power-to-liquids; shipping; aviation; heavy-duty vehicles; costs; policy

资金

  1. Ford's University Research Program
  2. Swedish Energy Agency within the industrial and academic collaboration project 'Future Alternative Transportation Fuels'
  3. Swedish Energy Agency
  4. Swedish Knowledge Centre for Renewable Transportation Fuels (f3) [P48357-1]
  5. Innovation Fund Denmark [6154-00022B]
  6. Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Programme Denmark [64017-0011]
  7. Mistra-the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
  8. Nordic funders
  9. Energiforsk

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review assesses the feasibility and potential of electrofuels (e-fuels) produced from low-CO2 electricity, water, and carbon (or nitrogen) for road, ocean, and air transport. The assessment finds that the carbon abatement costs for e-fuels are estimated to be relatively high, but combined biofuel and e-fuels production pathways are more cost-competitive. However, the limited availability of sustainable biomass constrains the development of these pathways. Further research is needed to address uncertainties in production costs, vehicle costs, and environmental performance.
To meet climate targets the emissions of greenhouse gases from transport need to be reduced considerably. Electrofuels (e-fuels) produced from low-CO2 electricity, water, and carbon (or nitrogen) are potential low-climate-impact transportation fuels. The purpose of this review is to provide a technoeconomic assessment of the feasibility and potential of e-fuels for road, ocean, and air transport. The assessment is based on a review of publications discussing e-fuels for one or more transport modes. For each transport mode, (a) e-fuel options are mapped, (b) cost per transport unit (e.g. vehicle km) and carbon abatement costs are estimated and compared to conventional options, (c) prospects and challenges are highlighted, and (d) policy context is described. Carbon abatement costs for e-fuels (considering vehicle cost, fuel production and distribution cost) are estimated to be in the range 110-1250 euro tonne-1 CO2 with e-gasoline and e-diesel at the high end of the range. The investigated combined biofuel and e-fuels production pathways (based on forest residues and waste) are more cost-competitive than the stand-alone e-fuel production pathways, but the global availability of sustainable biomass is limited making these pathways more constrained. While the potential for e-fuels to decarbonize the transport sector has been discussed extensively in the literature, many uncertainties in terms of production costs, vehicle costs and environmental performance remain. It is too early to rule out or strongly promote particular e-fuels for different transport modes. For e-fuels to play a significant role in transportation, their attractiveness relative to other transport options needs to be improved. Incentives will be needed for e-fuels to be cost-effective and increased clarity on how e-fuels are linked to existing policies is needed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据