4.6 Article

A DOA Estimation Method for Sparse Array Based on DFT Spectrum of Received Signals

期刊

IEEE ACCESS
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 95849-95858

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3205343

关键词

Sensor arrays; Estimation; Direction-of-arrival estimation; Sensors; Discrete Fourier transforms; Array signal processing; Apertures; Array signal processing; sparse array; DOA estimation; difference co-array

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new method for DOA estimation of sparse array received signals, utilizing DFT spectrum for initial estimation, optimizing estimation accuracy through a new strategy for dividing the over-complete redundant dictionary, and applying Taylor expansion to OMP algorithm in fine angle search process.
In the direction of arrival (DOA) estimation of sparse array received signals, the estimation accuracy of the grid search method in compressed sensing is improved with the increase of over-complete redundant dictionary elements. However, the increase of over-complete redundant dictionary elements will lead to a significant increase in the computational complexity of this method. In order to reduce the computational complexity caused by over-complete redundant dictionary division, based on the equivalent received signal of large aperture continuous difference co-array generated by sparse array, a DOA estimation method using discrete Fourier transform (DFT) spectrum of signal for initial estimation is proposed in this paper. After obtaining the DFT spectrum of the equivalent signal, based on the correspondence between the DFT spectrum and the actual angle value, this paper proposes a new strategy for dividing the over-complete redundant dictionary. In the process of fine angle search, this paper applies Taylor expansion to orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) algorithm to obtain higher estimation accuracy. Numerical simulation results demonstrate the advantages of the proposed estimation method over the other methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据