Evaluation methodology for deep learning imputation models

There is growing interest in imputing missing data in tabular datasets using deep learning. Existing deep learning-based imputation models have been commonly evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE) as the predictive accuracy metric. In this article, we investigate the limitations of assessing deep learning-based imputation models by conducting a comparative analysis between RMSE and alternative metrics in the statistical literature including qualitative, predictive accuracy, statistical distance, and descriptive statistics. We design a new aggregated metric, called reconstruction loss (RL), to evaluate deep learning-based imputation models. We also develop and evaluate a novel imputation evaluation methodology based on RL. To minimize model and dataset biases, we use a regression imputation model and two different deep learning imputation models: denoising autoencoders and generative adversarial nets. We also use two tabular datasets from different industry sectors: health care and financial. Our results show that the proposed methodology is effective in evaluating multiple properties of the deep learning-based imputation model's reconstruction performance.

Automated summary

This article investigates the limitations of evaluating deep learning-based imputation models using alternative metrics, and proposes a new aggregated metric and evaluation methodology to assess the reconstruction performance of the models.