3.8 Review

IgG Avidity Test as a Tool for Discrimination between Recent and Distant Toxoplasma gondii Infection-Current Status of Studies

期刊

ANTIBODIES
卷 11, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antib11030052

关键词

IgG avidity; Toxoplasma gondii; diagnosis; toxoplasmosis; recombinant antigen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the diagnosis issue of Toxoplasma gondii infection, focusing on the IgG avidity test. The test serves as a useful serological indicator for confirming or excluding the active form of toxoplasmosis. Furthermore, the article presents current research topics related to the use of parasite recombinant antigens to improve the performance of IgG avidity tests.
Toxoplasma gondii, an obligate intracellular protozoan parasite, is the causative agent of one of the most prevalent zoonoses worldwide. T. gondii infection is extremely important from a medical point of view, especially for pregnant women, newborns with congenital infections, and immunocompromised individuals. Thus, an accurate and proper diagnosis of this infection is essential. Among the available diagnostic tests, serology is commonly used. However, traditional serological techniques have certain limitations in evaluating the duration of T. gondii infection, which is problematic, especially for pregnant women. Avidity of T. gondii-specific IgG antibodies seems to be a significant tool for discrimination between recent and distant infections. This article describes the problem of diagnosis of T. gondii infection, with regard to IgG avidity tests. The IgG avidity test is a useful serological indicator of toxoplasmosis, which in many cases can confirm or exclude the active form of the disease. IgG antibodies produced in the recent primary T. gondii infection are of low avidity while IgG antibodies with high avidity are detected in the chronic phase of infection. Furthermore, this paper presents important topics of current research that concern the usage of parasite recombinant antigens that may improve the performance of IgG avidity tests.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据