4.6 Article

Anisotropic Wettability of Bioinspired Surface Characterized by Friction Force

期刊

BIOMIMETICS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics7030108

关键词

bioinspired surface; wettability; contact angle; friction force; MPCP technique

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51973165]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042022kf1220]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The friction force measurement is a more advantageous method for characterizing surface wettability compared to contact angle and sliding angle measurements. The friction measurement reveals significant differences in opposite directions and shows strong dependence on periodic parameters.
Bioinspired surfaces with special wettabilities attract increasing attention due to their extensive applications in many fields. However, the characterizations of surface wettability by contact angle (CA) and sliding angle (SA) have clear drawbacks. Here, by using an array of triangular micropillars (ATM) prepared by soft lithography, the merits of measuring the friction force of a water droplet on ATM over measurements of CA and SA in characterizing the surface wettability are demonstrated. The CA and SA measurements show ignorable differences in the wettabilities of ATM in opposite directions (1.13%) and that with different periodic parameters under the elongation ranging from 0 to 70%. In contrast, the friction measurement reveals a difference of > 10% in opposite directions. Moreover, the friction force shows a strong dependence on the periodic parameters which is regulated by mechanical stretching. Increasing the elongation from 0 to 50% increases the static and kinetic friction force up to 23.0% and 22.9%, respectively. Moreover, the stick-slip pattern during kinetic friction can reveal the periodic features of the measured surface. The friction force measurement is a sensitive technique that could find applications in the characterization of surface wettabilities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据