4.6 Article

Functional Neurons Generated from T Cell-Derived Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Neurological Disease Modeling

期刊

STEM CELL REPORTS
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 422-435

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2016.01.010

关键词

-

资金

  1. Project for Realization of Regenerative Medicine and Support for Core Institutes for iPS Cell Research from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT)
  2. Research Center Network for Realization Research Centers/Projects of Regenerative Medicine (the Program for Intractable Disease Research utilizing disease-specific iPS Cells) from Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED)
  4. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO)
  5. Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  6. MEXT
  7. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26830018, 16K08280, 15H04842, 15K15041, 26870074] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Modeling of neurological diseases using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from the somatic cells of patients has provided a means of elucidating pathogenic mechanisms and performing drug screening. T cells are an ideal source of patient-specific iPSCs because they can be easily obtained from samples. Recent studies indicated that iPSCs retain an epigenetic memory relating to their cell of origin that restricts their differentiation potential. The classical method of differentiation via embryoid body formation was not suitable for T cell-derived iPSCs (TiPSCs). We developed a neurosphere-based robust differentiation protocol, which enabled TiPSCs to differentiate into functional neurons, despite differences in global gene expression between TiPSCs and adult human dermal fibroblast-derived iPSCs. Furthermore, neurons derived from TiPSCs generated from a juvenile patient with Parkinson's disease exhibited several Parkinson's disease phenotypes. Therefore, we conclude that TiPSCs are a useful tool for modeling neurological diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据