3.8 Review

Does coronavirus disease 2019 kill more elderly men than women due to different hormonal milieu

期刊

JOURNAL OF MID-LIFE HEALTH
卷 13, 期 2, 页码 96-99

出版社

WOLTERS KLUWER MEDKNOW PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_37_22

关键词

Andropause; coronavirus disease 2019; menopause; severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2; testosterone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between testosterone levels in aging males and the severity of COVID-19 infection. More large-scale clinical studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis. Further scientific research is also necessary to determine the impact of sex hormones and gender on disease incidence and case fatality, as well as the effectiveness of hormone treatment for COVID-19 in elderly men and women.
Preliminary data depicts a much greater prevalence and high case-fatality rate in advanced age males as compared to age-matched women with severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 infections with high morbidity, mortality, high referral, and admission to intensive care unit with severe sequelae. However, the literature search revealed both for and against studies in this context. Thus, at present, in light of the mixed studies, it cannot be established whether low testosterone levels in aging hypogonadal males create a permissive environment for severe response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and can it increase the morbidity or mortality, or on the contrary if the virus inhibits androgen formation. Hence, it is highly warranted to establish the said hypothesis by conducting large statistically powered clinical studies in future. Further, it is highly indicated that impact of sex hormones and gender on the incidence and case fatality of the disease and hormones as a treatment according to sex and gender for COVID requires further scientific research by the research community before it is actually recommended to mitigate the COVID-19 disease course among elderly men and women at large.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据