4.6 Article

Surface state modulation of blue-emitting carbon dots with high quantum yield and high product yield

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 12, 期 42, 页码 27431-27441

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra05623b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundational Research Project of Shanxi Province [20210302123164, 20210302124604]
  2. Shanxi-Zheda Institute of Advanced Materials and Chemical Engineering [2021SX-TD012]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51972221]
  4. Shanxi Scholarship Council of China [2020-051, HGKY2019027]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the surface state modulation mechanism of carbon dots (CDs) with high quantum yield (QY) and high product yield (PY). The findings show that CDs with high QY have a high content of C=O and pyrrolic N on their surface. Additionally, the product yield of CDs is not only determined by the presence of a crosslinked structure, but also positively correlated with pyridinic N content.
In order to explore the surface state modulation mechanism of carbon dots (CDs) with high quantum yield (QY) and high product yield (PY), CDs were synthesized from different carbon sources with different contents of oxygen-containing functional groups and different silane coupling agents with nitrogen-containing functional groups. The highest QY of as-prepared CDs can reach 97.32% and the PY values of CDs are all high ranging from 46.33-58.76%. It is found that the high content of C=O and pyrrolic N on the surface of CDs can endow CDs with high QY. Moreover, the PY of CDs not only depends on whether CDs have the crosslinked structure, but also is closely and positively correlated with pyridinic N. Consequently, our findings suggest that raw materials rich in carboxyl groups and amino groups are beneficial to the synthesis of CDs with high QY, and whether CDs with crosslinked structure and high content of pyridinic N decide the high PY of CDs. This work provides a theoretical guidance for large-scale synthesis of CDs with high QY and high PY.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据