4.8 Article

Organocatalytic asymmetric azidation of sulfoxonium ylides: mild synthesis of enantioenriched α-azido ketones bearing a labile tertiary stereocenter

期刊

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 39, 页码 11648-11655

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2sc03552a

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91956114]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [16303420, 6309321]
  3. Innovation and Technology Commission [ITC-CNERC14SC01]
  4. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Catalytic Materials and Technology [BM2012110]
  5. Jiangsu specially appointed professors program
  6. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee [JCYJ20200109141408054]
  7. Changzhou University [ZMF21020030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A catalytic asymmetric azidation reaction for the efficient synthesis of alpha-azido ketones bearing a labile tertiary stereocenter is disclosed. Detailed mechanistic studies provided important insights into the reaction pathway, and a simplified alternative protocol using a cheaper HN3 source was developed.
Disclosed here is a catalytic asymmetric azidation reaction for the efficient synthesis of alpha-azido ketones bearing a labile tertiary stereocenter. With a superb chiral squaramide catalyst, a mild asymmetric formal H-N-3 insertion of alpha-carbonyl sulfoxonium ylides proceeded with excellent efficiency and enantioselectivity. This organocatalytic process not only complements the previous alpha-azidation approaches for the formation of quaternary stereocenters and mostly for 1,3-dicarbonyl compounds, but also has advantages over the well-known metal-catalyzed asymmetric carbene insertion chemistry using alpha-diazocarbonyl compounds. Detailed mechanistic studies via control reactions and NMR studies provided important insights into the reaction pathway, which features reversible protonation and dynamic kinetic resolution. The curiosity in mechanism also led to the development of a simplified alternative protocol with a cheaper HN3 source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据