4.5 Article

Satellite tracking reveals sex-specific migration distance in green turtles (Chelonia mydas)

期刊

BIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 18, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2022.0325

关键词

animal tracking; migration; sea turtles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Satellite tracking is an important tool for studying sea turtles in the wild, but there is still limited knowledge about male sea turtles. By tracking male green turtles during the breeding season, researchers found differences in migration distances between males and females, with male foraging areas overlapping with those of females. These findings provide important insights into the reproductive roles and movement ecology of sea turtles.
Satellite tracking is a key tool for studying sea turtles in the wild. Most tracking has been performed on adult females however, leaving knowledge gaps regarding other population segments, such as adult males. By satellite tracking 12 male green turtles (Chelonia mydas) at a breeding site in West Africa, we describe their movements from the breeding to the foraging grounds and compare migrations with those of 13 females tracked in the same season. During the mating period, some males remained near the focal nesting site, while others performed exploratory movements, apparently to visit other nearby rookeries. Males migrated on average shorter distances to foraging grounds (377 km, range 50-1081, n = 9) compared to females (1038 km, range 957-1850, n = 11]). Importantly, male foraging areas overlapped with previously described areas for females, suggesting sex-specific migration distances are not derived from differences in habitat selection. Strong support for differential migration by sex in sea turtles has hitherto been found in just one other species, but indications are that it may be a general feature in this group. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the interplay between reproductive roles and movement ecology of these emblematic animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据