4.8 Article

Interfacial Bi-S bonds modulate band alignment for efficient solar water oxidation

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 14, 期 39, 页码 14520-14528

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr04454d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52025028, 52072254, 51872191, 12074277]
  2. Yangzhou City [YZ2020263]
  3. Yangzhou University, China [YZ2020263]
  4. Key University Science Research Project of Jiangsu Province [21KJA430005]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introducing Bi-S bonds into heterojunction interfaces can enhance the performance of photoelectrochemical water oxidation by adjusting band alignment and carrier separation efficiency.
Introducing suitable interfacial chemical bonds into heterojunctions can increase the charge carrier density, propel the charge separation, and facilitate interfacial charge extraction in photoanodes for photoelectrochemical (PEC) water oxidation. However, tuning chemical bonds at heterojunction interfaces and elucidating their influences on band alignment and the associated evolution of PEC performance remain elusive. Herein, Bi-S bonds were introduced into the interface of a CdIn2S4 (CIS)/Bi2WO6 (BWO) heterojunction. In situ irradiated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electron spin resonance signals confirm that the Bi-S bond transforms the band alignment from type II to the direct Z-scheme, significantly enhancing the carrier separation efficiency. Theoretical calculations show that the Bi-S bond not only acts as an atomic-level charge transfer channel, but also changes the migration pathway and distance within the heterojunction. As a result, the optimized CIS/BWO photoanode exhibits a relatively high PEC performance of 4.25 mA cm(-2) at 1.23 V vs. RHE (V-RHE) and a low onset potential of 0.30 V-RHE. This work presents a new avenue to construct comprehensively improved photoanodes by tuning the interfacial structures at the atomic level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据