3.8 Article

Cell-Free Mitochondrial DNA in Acute Brain Injury

期刊

NEUROTRAUMA REPORTS
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 415-420

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neur.2022.0032

关键词

acute brain injury; brain inflammation; DAMP; mitochondrial DNA; subarachnoid hemorrhage; traumatic brain injury

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [212219/Z/18/Z]
  2. edical Research Council Mitochondrial Biology Unit [MC_UU_00015/9]
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) International Centre for Genomic Medicine in Neuromuscular Disease [MR/S005021/1]
  4. Leverhulme Trust [RPG-2018-408]
  5. MRC [MR/S035699/1]
  6. Alzheimer's Society [AS-PG-18b-02]
  7. NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre [BRC-1215-20014]
  8. Wellcome Trust [212219/Z/18/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage are significant global diseases with limited treatment options. This research found elevated levels of cell-free mtDNA in both cerebrospinal fluid and serum within 48 hours of brain injury, which correlated with clinical severity and inflammatory response. These findings suggest that ccf-mtDNA could serve as a biomarker for inflammation-related acute brain injury.
Traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Treatment options remain limited and are hampered by our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms, including the inflammatory response observed in the brain. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been shown to activate an innate inflammatory response by acting as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP). Here, we show raised circulating cell-free (ccf) mtDNA levels in both cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum within 48 h of brain injury. CSF ccf-mtDNA levels correlated with clinical severity and the interleukin-6 cytokine response. These findings support the use of ccf-mtDNA as a biomarker after acute brain injury linked to the inflammatory disease mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据