4.7 Article

Fuel exploitation and environmental degradation at the Iron Age copper industry of the Timna Valley, southern Israel

期刊

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
卷 12, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18940-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Marie Curie Career Integration Grant (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG) [334274]
  2. Israel Science Foundation [1880/17]
  3. Chudnow Family

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the fuel sources used by the ancient copper industry in its most intensive period and finds that it heavily relied on local vegetation, which expanded over time and had a detrimental impact on the local ecosystem.
Economic and industrial progress frequently comes at the expense of environmental sustainability. For the early Iron Age (-eleventh to ninth centuries BCE) smelters of the ancient copper industry of the Timna Valley, southern Israel, where today the hyper-arid Aravah Desert provides sparse vegetation, woody fuel for metallurgical furnaces constituted the greatest limiting factor for continued operations. This study presents the first investigation into the fuel sources relied upon by this industry during its most intensive period, as reflected by hundreds of charcoal samples collected from two well-stratified and chronologically anchored accumulations of industrial waste. The two sites demonstrate similar results: a heavy reliance on the local vegetation, particularly Retama raetam (white broom) and the ecologically significant Acacia spp. (acacia thorn trees), two high-calorific and high-burning taxa best suited for such purposes. It was also observed that over the course of the industry, the search for fuel expanded, as evidenced by the later appearance of taxa unsuited for the prevailing regional conditions, hinting at the detrimental toll the industry took on the local ecosystem. Altogether, it is suggested that the lucrative copper industry ended due to limits in the availability of fuel, caused by anthropogenic hastening of desertification and environmental degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据