4.1 Review

Colorectal Carcinoma, Cyclooxygenases, and COX Inhibitors

期刊

CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

CUREUS INC
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28579

关键词

gastrointestinal neoplasms; chemoprevention; celecoxib; aspirin; selective cox-2 inhibitors; (nsaid) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; cyclooxygenase inhibitors; cyclooxygenases; (crc) colorectal carcinoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal carcinoma is the most common gastrointestinal cancer, arising from benign precursor polyps and influenced by genetics, pathology, and COX enzymes. Inhibition of COX by NSAIDs is believed to be helpful in preventing colorectal carcinoma.
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the most common of gastrointestinal cancers, the majority presenting with sporadic occurrence compared to the less frequently inherited syndromes. The increasing incidence, decreasing gender and age disparities, and the prevalent risk factors are concerning. The malignancy arising from benign precursor polyps transforms slowly over time. The adenoma variant polyps reported a marked upregulation of cyclooxygenases (COX), significantly COX-2 isoform, influenced by various determinants such as genetics, pathology, histology, and site of the carcinoma. These COX enzymes are responsible for prostaglandin synthesis and the consequent cascade of cell inflammation and proliferation. Therefore, COX inhibition by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) targeted against both the isoforms COX-1 and COX-2 have been studied for decades in anticipation of preventing the occurrence of colorectal carcinoma in high-risk populations. This article has collated and highlighted the overexpression of COX enzymes by the adenomatous polyps and provides corroborating evidence from multiple studies in favor of COX inhibition by NSAIDs. Aspirin and Sulindac were two drugs to be initially proven to halt the progression and cause regression of the polyps. Celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor besides NSAIDs, was also used in experimental studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据