4.7 Article

A study of composite laminates failure using an anisotropic gradient-enhanced damage mean-field homogenization model

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 126, 期 -, 页码 246-264

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.02.070

关键词

Damage; Composite laminates; Mean-field homogenization; Multi-scale; Delamination

资金

  1. Consejerla de Educacion y Empleo of Comunidad de Madrid
  2. Walloon region [1017232, CT-EUC 2010-10-12]
  3. Luxembourg region
  4. Fonds National de la Recherche de Luxembourg
  5. European Union
  6. Fond de la Recherche Scientifique de Belgique (FRS-FNRS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The failure of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy laminates is studied using an anisotropic gradient-enhanced continuum damage model embedded in a mean-field homogenization scheme. In each ply, a homogenized material law is used to capture the intra-laminar failure. The anisotropy of the homogenized material model results from the homogenization method and from the reformulation of the non-local continuum damage theory to account for the material anisotropy. As a result the damage propagation direction in each ply is predicted with accuracy as compared to the experimental results, while the problems of losing uniqueness and strain localization, which occur in classical finite element simulations when strain softening of materials is involved, can be avoided. To model the delamination process, the hybrid discontinuous Galerkin/extrinsic cohesive law method is introduced at the ply interfaces. This hybrid method avoids the need to propagate topological changes in the mesh with the propagation of the delamination while it preserves the consistency and stability in the un-cracked interfaces. As a demonstration, open-hole coupons with different stacking sequences are studied numerically and experimentally. Both the intra- and inter-laminar failure patterns are shown to be well captured by the computational framework. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据