3.8 Proceedings Paper

High spectral-resolution interferometry down to 1 micron with Asgard/BIFROST at VLTI: Science drivers and project overview

出版社

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2627973

关键词

high angular resolution imaging; interferometry; BIFROST; Asgard; VLTI; planet formation; protoplanetary disks; extrasolar planets

资金

  1. European Research Council (ERC) [101003096]
  2. STFC Consolidated Grant [ST/V000721/1]
  3. ERC under the European Union [CoG-866070]
  4. European Union [101004719]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [101003096] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents the science cases and instrument design considerations for the BIFROST instrument, which aims to open a new window for the VLT Interferometer. It discusses how BIFROST can be used to study stellar evolution, detect protoplanets, and probe planetary systems and multiple star systems.
We present science cases and instrument design considerations for the BIFROST instrument that will open the short-wavelength (Y/J/H-band), high spectral dispersion (up to R=25,000) window for the VLT Interferometer. BIFROST will be part of the Asgard Suite of instruments and unlock powerful venues for studying accretion & mass-loss processes at the early/late stages of stellar evolution, for detecting accreting protoplanets around young stars, and for probing the spin-orbit alignment in directly-imaged planetary systems and multiple star systems. Our survey on GAIA binaries aims to provide masses and precision ages for a thousand stars, providing a legacy data set for improving stellar evolutionary models as well as for Galactic Archaeology. BIFROST will enable off-axis spectroscopy of exoplanets in the 0.025-1 '' separation range, enabling high-SNR, high spectral resolution follow-up of exoplanets detected with ELT and JWST. We give an update on the status of the project, outline our key technology choices, and discuss synergies with other instruments in the proposed Asgard Suite of instruments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据