4.8 Article

Bioinspired omnidirectional antireflective film with mechanical durability for efficient solar energy collection

期刊

MATTER
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 2990-3008

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2022.06.015

关键词

-

资金

  1. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [52021003]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875244, U19A20103, 52105301]
  3. Jilin University Science and Technology Innovative Research Team [2020TD-03]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a biomimetic antireflective film (BARF) with a multiscale hierarchical architecture inspired by ommateum was successfully prepared. The BARF exhibited excellent omnidirectional antireflection and mechanical durability, making it suitable for applications in solar cells and other fields.
Soaring developments in solar cells raise an urgent demand for superior antireflective (AR) materials to tackle the concern of their inadequate photovoltaic efficiency. Unfortunately, conventional AR films still suffer from a deficiency in omnidirectional antireflection and mechanical durability, significantly weakening their light -harvesting capability. Herein, a scalable biomimetic antireflective film (BARF) with ommateum-inspired multiscale hierarchical architecture was prepared using a method combining layer-by-layer ther-mal decomposition and in situ self-assembly. Remarkably, the BARF exhibited a transmittance of over 95% in light incident angles from -75 to 75 & DEG;. Thereby, the output voltage of solar cells coated with BARF increased by 30.48% compared with commercial AR film. Furthermore, the BARF demonstrated excellent mechanical durability in falling-sand tests (-2% transmittance loss). This work offers a general strategy for mass production of omnidirectional and dura-ble AR films that are suitable for practical applications of protective AR film in solar cells, light pollution treatment, and video stealth technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据