4.7 Article

Generalized covariant entropy bound in Lanczos-Lovelock gravity

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 106, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.106.064002

关键词

-

资金

  1. GuangDong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [217200003]
  2. Talents Introduction Foundation of Beijing Normal University [310432102]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12005080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the generalized covariant entropy bound in the theory where the Einstein gravity is perturbed by higher-order Lovelock terms. By selecting a smooth light sheet under the perturbation limit, replacing the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy with the Jacobson-Myers entropy, and introducing two reasonable physical assumptions, it is shown that the corresponding generalized covariant entropy bound is satisfied under a higher-order approximation of the perturbation from the higher-order Lovelock terms. This result implies the strict adherence of the Jacobson-Myers entropy to the entropy bound under the perturbation level, and the satisfaction of the generalized second law of Lanczos-Lovelock gravity when the Einstein gravity is perturbed by higher-order Lovelock terms.
In this paper, we investigate the generalized covariant entropy bound in the theory where the Einstein gravity is perturbed by the higher-order Lovelock terms. After choosing the light sheet that is smooth under the perturbation limit, replacing the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy with the Jacobson-Myers entropy, and introducing two reasonable physical assumptions, we show that the corresponding generalized covariant entropy bound is satisfied under a higher-order approximation of the perturbation from the higher-order Lovelock terms. Our result implies that the Jacobson-Myers entropy strictly obeys the entropy bound under the perturbation level, and the generalized second law of Lanczos-Lovelock gravity is also satisfied when the Einstein gravity is perturbed by the higher-order Lovelock terms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据