4.6 Article

Existing tests vs. novel non-invasive assays for detection of invasive aspergillosis in patients with respiratory diseases

期刊

CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL
卷 135, 期 13, 页码 1545-1554

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002050

关键词

Invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; Sputum; Bronchoalveolar lavage; Galactomannan; Lateral-flow device

资金

  1. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2019YFS0231]
  2. 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University [2018-119]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the utility of different mycological tests in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases. The results suggest that sputum GM and LFD assays may be effective alternatives to BAL GM test.
Background: Although existing mycological tests (bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL] galactomannan [GM], serum GM, serum (1,3)-beta-D-glucan [BDG], and fungal culture) are widely used for diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-hematological patients with respiratory diseases, their clinical utility in this large population is actually unclear. We aimed to resolve this clinical uncertainty by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and utility of existing tests and explore the efficacy of novel sputum-based Aspergillus assays. Methods: Existing tests were assessed in a prospective and consecutive cohort of patients with respiratory diseases in West China Hospital between 2016 and 2019 while novel sputum assays (especially sputum GM and Aspergillus-specific lateral-flow device [LFD]) in a case-controlled subcohort. IPA was defined according to the modified European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group criteria. Sensitivity and specificity were computed for each test and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Results: The entire cohort included 3530 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 66, no IPA = 3464) and the subcohort included 127 admissions (proven/probable IPA = 38, no IPA = 89). Sensitivity of BAL GM (>= 1.0 optical density index [ODI]: 86% [24/28]) was substantially higher than that of serum GM (>= 0.5 ODI: 38% [39/102]) (chi(2) = 19.83, P < 0.001), serum BDG (>= 70 pg/mL: 33% [31/95]) (chi(2) = 24.65, P < 0.001), and fungal culture (33% [84/253]) (chi(2) = 29.38, P < 0.001). Specificity varied between BAL GM (>= 1.0 ODI: 94% [377/402]), serum GM (>= 0.5 ODI: 95% [2130/2248]), BDG (89% [1878/2106]), and culture (98% [4936/5055]). Sputum GM (>= 2.0 ODI) had similar sensitivity (84% [32/38]) (Fisher's exact P = 1.000) to and slightly lower specificity (87% [77/89]) (chi(2) = 5.52, P = 0.019) than BAL GM (>= 1.0 ODI). Area under the ROC curve values were comparable between sputum GM (0.883 [0.812-0.953]) and BAL GM (0.901 [0.824-0.977]) (P = 0.734). Sputum LFD had similar specificity (91% [81/89]) (chi(2) = 0.89, P = 0.345) to and lower sensitivity (63% [24/38]) (chi(2) = 4.14, P = 0.042) than BAL GM (>= 1.0 ODI), but significantly higher sensitivity than serum GM (>= 0.5 ODI) (chi(2) = 6.95, P = 0.008), BDG (chi(2) = 10.43, P = 0.001), and fungal culture (chi(2) = 12.70, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Serum GM, serum BDG, and fungal culture lack sufficient sensitivity for diagnosing IPA in respiratory patients. Sputum GM and LFD assays hold promise as rapid, sensitive, and non-invasive alternatives to the BAL GM test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据