4.0 Article

Synergistic corrosion inhibitor of carbon steel by dihydroxy benzyl phosphonic acid-Zn2+system in O.5 M H2SO4: Experimental and theoretical studies

期刊

INDIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 4, 页码 402-411

出版社

NATL INST SCIENCE COMMUNICATION-NISCAIR

关键词

Corrosion inhibition; DFT; FTIR; Phosphonic Acid; SEM; Synergistic effect; XC48

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The synergistic effect of DPA and Zn2+ has been found to have remarkable inhibitory efficiency on carbon steel X48. The combination of DPA and Zn2+ inhibits both the anodic and cathodic reactions to the same amount, and exhibits significant adsorption on the surface steel.
The synergistic effect of dihydroxy benzyl phosphonic acid (DAP) and zinc sulfate ZnSO4 (Zn2+) system in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution on carbon steel X48 has been evaluated using potentiodynamic polarization measurements, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), scanning electron microscope (SEM), and quantum methods (DFT). The combination of DPA and Zn2+ has been demonstrated to have remarkable inhibitory efficiency (96%). DPA/Zn2+ formulation operate as a mixed inhibitor, inhibiting both the anodic and cathodic reactions to the same amount, according to polarization studies. The diameter of the semicircles increases with the addition of DPA/Zn2+ formulation. Furthermore, the double layer capacitance Cdl decreases and Rt values increase with this combination of DPA and Zn2+, confirming the significant adsorption on the surface steel. The adsorption isotherm of Langmuir is approached by the adsorption on the metal surface. The nature of the protective coating is also determined using surface characterization techniques (FTIR and SEM). The molecular orbital (HOMO and LUMO) energies, energy gap (AEgap), dipole moment (??), global hardness (II), global softness (a), electrophilicity index (a), absolute electronegativity (x) and the fraction of transferred electrons (AN) have been determined as supporting evidence. Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据