4.4 Article

Models in Engineering Design as Decision-Making Aids

期刊

ENGINEERING STUDIES
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 134-157

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19378629.2022.2129061

关键词

Engineering model; modeling; representation; design; epistemic vehicle; philosophy of science; philosophy of engineering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper discusses the importance of models in engineering design and highlights the differences between models in engineering and models in science. Models in engineering are not just representational tools, but central to the decision-making process. Only engineers understand and determine the relationship between the model and the target system. A better understanding of the social process of design is essential to understanding the roles of models in engineering.
Although models and modeling are central to engineering design, they have received much less attention than models or modeling in the philosophy of science. This paper draws on insights from the philosophical literature on models in science to elucidate models in engineering. Many of the apparent differences are a matter of degree. Models in engineering design do not function solely as representational or more general epistemic vehicles. Rather, models are central to facilitating decision making. This seems to be less pronounced in laboratory practices for scientific research than in engineering design. In engineering, often only the designers understand and determine the relation between the model and its target system. In this, they serve as truth makers and truth keepers. This social process of design is essential to understanding the role of models and modeling from a meta perspective, but is also relevant to engineer when models are reused. A better understanding of these roles can help to illuminate the roles of models in engineering. To illustrate these points, this paper uses the design of a 3D printed kayak as an example that shows how even a fairly modest engineering design project requires the creation of a multitude of different models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据