4.0 Article Proceedings Paper

Intraoperative OCT Imaging of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System

期刊

OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING RETINA
卷 47, 期 11, 页码 999-1003

出版社

SLACK INC
DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20161031-03

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/NEI [K23-EY022947-01A1]
  2. Ohio Department of Development [TECH-13-059]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness [RPB1580DM]
  4. Bioptigen
  5. Synergetics
  6. Genentech
  7. Regeneron
  8. Thrombogenics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Optimal placement of the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System (Second Sight Medical Products, Sylmar, CA) is critical. Intraoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) allows for intrasurgical visualization and confirmation of array placement. In this study, two different OCT systems were evaluated to assess the feasibility and utility of this technology during Argus II surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraoperative OCT was performed on five patients undergoing Argus II implantation at Cole Eye Institute from June 2015 to July 2016. The EnVisu portable OCT (Bioptigen, Morrisville, NC) and microscope-integrated RESCAN 700 (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) intraoperative OCT systems were utilized. The EnVisu was used in three patients and the RESCAN 700 in three of the five patients. Following array tacking, intraoperative OCT was performed over the entire array including the edges and tack. RESULTS: Intraoperative OCT allowed for visualization of the array/retina interface. Microscope integration of the OCT system facilitated ease of focusing, real-time feedback, surgeon-directed OCT scanning to the areas of interest, and enhanced image quality at points of interest. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative imaging of the Argus II electrode array is feasible and provides information about electrode array-retina interface and distance to help guide a surgeon. Microscope integration of OCT appears to provide an optimal and efficient approach to intraoperative OCT during Argus II array placement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据