4.1 Article

Identifying archaeological parenchyma in three dimensions: Diagnostic assessment of five important food plant species in the Indo-Pacific region

期刊

ARCHAEOLOGY IN OCEANIA
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 189-213

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/arco.5276

关键词

archaeobotany; microCT; parenchyma; Dioscorea spp; Araceae; Ipomoea batatas; archeobotanique; microCT; parenchyme; Dioscorea spp; Araceae; Ipomoea batatas

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Future Fellowship [FT150100420]
  2. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Archaeobotanical evidence for the exploitation of underground storage organs (USOs) in the tropical regions of Australia, Southeast Asia, and the Pacific is limited. This study uses microCT imaging technology to create a 3D virtual reference collection of five key USO species, providing insights into their diversity and inter-specific differences.
Archaeobotanical evidence for the exploitation of vegetatively propagated underground storage organs (USOs) in the tropical regions of Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific is currently limited. Although there have been several key studies of archaeological parenchyma published in the past two decades, systematic application of identification methods for vegetatively propagated crop species utilising charred, desiccated or waterlogged remains of parenchymatous tissue is not undertaken on a regular basis. Here, microCT imaging technology is used to compile a three-dimensional virtual reference collection of parenchymatous tissues for five key USO species known to have been extensively cultivated by people in these regions. The five species are Dioscorea alata, Dioscorea esculenta, Colocasia esculenta, Alocasia macrorrhiza and Ipomoea batatas. These reference samples are used to illustrate the character of the virtual, microCT derived reference collection, and they also capture inter-species differentiation and intra-species morphological variation characteristic of many tuberous root crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据