4.6 Article

Optimal design and experimental validation of 3D printed soft pneumatic actuators

期刊

SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1367-665X/ac95e3

关键词

topology optimization; design-dependent loading; soft pneumatic actuator; 3D printing; soft gripper

资金

  1. Australian Research Council via Discovery-Project Grants [DP140104408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a novel design of a bending-type soft pneumatic actuator and validates it through optimization and finite element analysis. The optimized design achieves a 19.5% improvement in bending angle and is verified via prototyping, pressure testing, and grasping experiments.
This study develops a novel design of a unit cell-based bending-type soft pneumatic actuator, and formulates the design problem as compliant mechanisms under design-dependent pressure loadings. The proposed design is first optimized by using a topology optimization algorithm, in which the design-dependent loads and fluid-structure interface are tracked and formulated via finite element based approaches. Then, to validate the optimized design, it is modeled numerically using finite element analysis (FEA) and compared with the non-optimized traditional rectangular design. The optimal design can provide 19.5% improvements in bending angle. In addition, the proposed optimal design is prototyped using 3D printing. The prepared single actuator specimens are tested under pneumatic pressure, and the measured deformations are compared with those obtained from FEA. The results reveal that the optimized design can undergo large and compliant deformations under pneumatic pressure and generate a full (360 degrees) bending. Furthermore, multiple actuator specimens of the proposed design are also assembled and integrated to prototype soft pneumatic grippers, with which several grasping tests are conducted. The adaptability and compatibility of the soft gripper are verified via gripping a wide range of irregular, soft, and fragile objects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据