4.6 Article

Pebax® 2533/PVDF thin film mixed matrix membranes containing MIL-101 (Fe)/GO composite for CO2 capture

期刊

RSC ADVANCES
卷 12, 期 45, 页码 29124-29136

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ra05095a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Excellence Initiative -Research University -Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun (Emerging Field and Grants4NCUStudents)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MIL-101 (Fe) and MIL-GO composites were used as fillers to improve the CO2/N-2 separation performance of Pebax (R) 2533/PVDF thin film MMMs. The porous structure of MIL-GO-2 and the diffusion pathways created by GO nanosheets enhanced the permeability and selectivity of the thin film.
MIL-101 (Fe) and MIL-GO composites were successfully synthesized and used as fillers for the preparation of Pebax (R) 2533/PVDF thin film MMMs for CO2/N-2 separation. The defect-free Pebax (R) 2533/PVDF thin film MMMs were fabricated by casting the Pebax solution containing fillers on the PVDF support. The presence of GO nanosheets in the reaction solution did not destroy the crystal structure of MIL-101 (Fe). However, the BET surface area and total pore volume of MIL-GO decreased dramatically, comparing with MIL-101 (Fe). The incorporation of MIL-GO-2 into Pebax matrix simultaneously increased the CO2 permeability and the CO2/N-2 ideal selectivity of Pebax (R) 2533/PVDF thin film MMMs mainly owing to the porous structure of MIL-GO-2, and the tortuous diffusion pathways created by GO nanosheets. MMMs containing 9.1 wt% MIL-GO-2 exhibited the highest CO2 permeability equal to 303 barrer (1 barrer = 10(-10) cm(3) (STP) cm cm(-2) s(-1) cmHg(-1)) and the highest CO2/N-2 ideal selectivity equal to 24. Pebax-based MMMs containing composite fillers showed higher gas separation performance than the Pebax-based MMMs containing single filler (GO or MOFs). Therefore, the synthesis and utilization of 3D@2D composite filler demonstrated great potential in the preparation of high-performance MMMs for gas separation processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据