4.6 Article

An enantio- and diastereoselective approach to indoloquinolizidines in continuous flow

期刊

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
卷 20, 期 42, 页码 8273-8279

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2ob01462a

关键词

-

资金

  1. MINECO/FEDER [PID2019109236RB-I00]
  2. MICINN through Severo Ochoa Excellence Accreditation 2020-2023 [CEX2019-000925-S]
  3. CERCA Program/Generalitat de Catalunya
  4. European Union [890452]
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [890452] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the merging of polymer-supported asymmetric organocatalysis with continuous flow in a packed bed reactor was successfully used for the synthesis of indoloquinolizidines. A highly enantioselective, solvent-free and rapid conjugate addition reaction in continuous flow allowed the preparation of multigram amounts of relevant oxodiesters. The obtained Michael adducts were then used for the efficient diastereoselective synthesis of indoloquinolizidines through cascade Pictet-Splengler cyclisation-lactamisation in continuous flow. The conversion of enantiopure Michael adducts into delta-lactones via telescoped reduction/cyclisation in continuous flow was also explored.
Merging polymer-supported asymmetric organocatalysis with continuous flow in a packed bed reactor has been used as the key, enantiodetermining step in a short synthesis of indoloquinolizidines. Using this approach, a highly enantioselective, solvent-free and rapid conjugate addition of dimethyl malonate to a diverse family of cinnamaldehydes in continuous flow, allowing the preparation of relevant oxodiesters in multigram amounts has been developed. The obtained Michael adducts have been used to complete an expedient diastereoselective synthesis of indoloquinolizidine via cascade Pictet-Splengler cyclisation-lactamisation in continuous flow. The conversion of enantiopure Michael adducts into delta-lactones via telescoped reduction/cyclisation in continuous flow has also been explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据