4.6 Article

Balance between immunoregulatory B cells and plasma cells drives pancreatic tumor immunity

期刊

CELL REPORTS MEDICINE
卷 3, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100744

关键词

-

资金

  1. University Cancer Research Fund at the UNC Chapel Hill [R37 CA230786]
  2. V Foundation for Cancer Research [V2016-016]
  3. Concern Foundation Conquer Cancer Now Award [R35 CA232109]
  4. Cancer Center Core Support Grant [P30 CA016086]
  5. UNC School of Medicine strategic funds

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The dysregulation of B cells in patients and tumor-bearing mice often leads to the failure of anti-tumor immune responses. By targeting the signaling network in B cells, the differentiation of B cells into anti-tumor plasma cells can be restored, resulting in increased accumulation of effector T cells and plasma cells in tumors and making pancreatic tumors sensitive to immunotherapy.
Plasma cell responses are associated with anti-tumor immunity and favorable response to immunotherapy. B cells can amplify anti-tumor immune responses through antibody production; yet B cells in patients and tumor-bearing mice often fail to support this effector function. We identify dysregulated transcriptional pro-gram in B cells that disrupts differentiation of naive B cells into anti-tumor plasma cells. The signaling network contributing to this dysfunction is driven by interleukin (IL) 35 stimulation of a STAT3-PAX5 complex that up -regulates the transcriptional regulator BCL6 in naive B cells. Transient inhibition of BCL6 in tumor-educated naive B cells is sufficient to reverse the dysfunction in B cell differentiation, stimulating the intra-tumoral accumulation of plasma cells and effector T cells and rendering pancreatic tumors sensitive to anti -pro-grammed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) blockade. Our findings argue that B cell effector dysfunction in cancer can be due to an active systemic suppression program that can be targeted to synergize with T cell-directed immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据