4.7 Article

Adhesively bonded connections between composite sandwich floor panels for building rehabilitation

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 255-268

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.08.080

关键词

Sandwich panels; Connections; Adhesive joint; GFRP; Polyurethane foam; Balsa wood

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [PTDC/ECM/113041/2009]
  2. ICIST
  3. FCT [SFRH/BD/78584/2011]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/78584/2011, PTDC/ECM/113041/2009] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A connection system between adjacent sandwich panels for use in building floor rehabilitation, consisting of an adhesively (epoxy) bonded Z-joint, is proposed and studied. Experimental and numerical investigations were carried out to assess the joints' behaviour under vertical loads, their effect on the overall mechanical response of the sandwich floor panels, and the stress distributions within the various panel components. Their behaviour along the transverse and longitudinal (main span) directions was studied for panels made of glass-fibre reinforced polymer (GFRP) faces and two types of cores: polyurethane (PUR) foam and balsa wood. The joints' failure along the transverse direction occurred in the GFRP elements due to excessive through-thickness tensile stresses failure in the adhesive layer was not observed. In the longitudinal direction, joint failure did not occur. The developed FE models were able to simulate the behaviour of the connections and jointed panels, providing reasonably accurate predictions for the deformations and failure modes experimentally observed. The joints significantly increased the panels' shear stiffness, but showed limited influence on their bending stiffness. Although the flexural stiffness of the PUR foam and balsa wood cored panels was similar, the balsa wood core absorbed a significantly higher portion of shear force. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据