4.6 Article

Novel Hybrid Nanoparticles of Vanadium Nitride/Porous Carbon as an Anode Material for Symmetrical Supercapacitor

期刊

NANO-MICRO LETTERS
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40820-016-0105-5

关键词

Supercapacitors; Nanoparticle; Vanadium nitride; Porous carbon; Hybrid materials

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51203071, 51363014, 51463012]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M552509, 2015T81064]
  3. Natural Science Funds of the Gansu Province [2015GS05123]
  4. Program for Hongliu Distinguished Young Scholars in Lanzhou University of Technology [J201402]
  5. University Scientific Research Project of Gansu Province [2014B-025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid materials of vanadium nitride and porous carbon nanoparticles (VN/PCNPs) were fabricated by a facile pyrolysis process of vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) xerogel and melamine at relatively low temperature of 800 degrees C for supercapacitor application. The effects of the feed ratio of V2O5 to melamine (r), and nitrogen flow rate on the microstructure and electrochemical performance were also investigated. It was found that the size of the as-synthesized nanoparticles is about 20 nm. Both r value and N-2 flow rate have enormous impacts on morphology and microstructure of the nanoparticle, which correspondingly determined the electrochemical performance of the material. The VN/C hybrid nanoparticles exhibited high capacitive properties, and a maximum specific capacitance of 255.0 F g(-1) was achieved at a current density of 1.0 A g(-1) in 2 M KOH aqueous electrolyte and the potential range from 0 to -1.15 V. In addition, symmetrical supercapacitor fabricated with the as-synthesized VN/PCNPs presents a high specific capacitance of 43.5 F g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1) based on the entire cell, and an energy density of 8.0 Wh kg(-1) when the power density was 575 W kg(-1). Even when the power density increased to 2831.5 W kg(-1), the energy density still remained 6.1 Wh kg(-1).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据