4.3 Article

Spasticity in multiple sclerosis: Associations with impairments and overall quality of life

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.10.007

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; Spasticity; Quality of life; Disability; Fatigue; Depression

资金

  1. Biogen, United Kingdom
  2. MNDA, United Kingdom
  3. NIHR, United Kingdom [922-794]
  4. Novartis, United Kingdom
  5. Roche United Kingdom
  6. Teva United Kingdom
  7. Walton Neuroscience Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: (1) To determine the association between spasticity and quality of life (QOL) in multiple sclerosis (MS). (2) To investigate the associations between spasticity and impairments of function and activity limitations. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: A convenience sample of people with MS routinely attending an appointment with their local MS service. Participants: 701 patients with clinically definite MS. Main outcome measures: Demographic details were obtained and patients completed a battery of measures including spasticity (Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale - 88), fatigue (Neurological Fatigue Index MS), urinary dysfunction (Qualiveen-SF), pain (Neuropathic Pain Scale), mood disorder (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), disability (World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule) and QOL (Leeds Multiple Sclerosis QOL Scale). Results: 85.7% of patients reported spasticity. Patients with higher levels of spasticity were more likely to be disabled, suffer from depression and anxiety, have higher levels of fatigue and report more pain and bladder problems (p < 0.01). Spasticity remained as a significant direct effect upon QOL in a multivariate model adjusted for other impairments, activity limitation and depression. Conclusions: There is a strong association between spasticity and fatigue, depression, anxiety, pain and bladder problems. The retention of a significant direct relationship with QOL in a multivariate model emphasises its influence upon the everyday lives of people with MS. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据