4.2 Article

Determining lubrication properties of hierarchical groove patterns using mesoscale raster-scanning measurements

出版社

JAPAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2022jamdsm0030

关键词

Surface texturing; Nanostripe structure; Lubrication property; Friction coefficient distribution; Numerical calculation

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI
  2. [JP18H03750]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study characterizes the lubrication properties of micro- and nanogroove hierarchical patterns. The friction coefficient was found to periodically undulate along the scan lines with a period equal to the unit pattern. The presence of boundary bands affected the variation of friction coefficient, with Type H patterns exhibiting clearer undulation and a decrease in average friction coefficient at higher sliding speeds. Numerical calculations showed that oil films formed more easily on Type H patterns, and the kinetic friction coefficient decreased during parallel sliding but not during orthogonal friction.
In this study, we characterized the lubrication properties of two different hierarchical patterns comprising micro -and nanogrooves. The friction coefficient distribution was measured using a convex lens-the friction coefficients were found to periodically undulate along the scan lines with a period equal to the unit pattern. The variation of friction coefficient was more apparent in the case of the Type L pattern with the low boundary bands. For the Type H pattern with the high boundary bands, the undulation in the friction coefficient became clearer at higher sliding speeds, and concurrently, its average friction coefficient decreased with the higher sliding speed. Numerical calculations revealed that oil films formed more easily on Type H patterns than on Type L ones. When pause durations were included in Type H friction tests, the kinetic friction coefficient decreased when the lens slid parallel to the micro/nanogrooves, whereas it was not affected during orthogonal friction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据