4.6 Article

Monitoring of Hidden Corrosion Growth in Aircraft Structures Based on D-Sight Inspections and Image Processing

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22197616

关键词

corrosion; non-destructive testing; D-Sight; condition monitoring; image processing

资金

  1. Silesian University of Technology [10/060/SDU/10-21-01]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0182]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a method to monitor hidden corrosion growth in metallic aircraft structures using a sequence of D-Sight images, by analyzing the images through geometric transforms and segmentation techniques to eliminate the influence of measurement conditions.
Hidden corrosion in aircraft structures, not detected on time, can have a significant influence on aircraft structural integrity and lead to catastrophic consequences. According to the widely accepted damage tolerance philosophy, non-destructive inspections are performed to assess structural safety and reliability. One of the inspection techniques used for such an inspection is the optical D-Sight technique. Since D-Sight is used primarily as a qualitative method, it is difficult to assess the evolution of a structural condition simply by comparing the inspection results. In the following study, the method to monitor hidden corrosion growth is proposed on the basis of historical data from D-Sight inspections. The method is based on geometric transforms and segmentation techniques to remove the influence of measurement conditions, such as the angle of observation or illumination, and to compare corroded regions for a sequence of D-Sight images acquired during historical inspections. The analysis of the proposed method was performed on the sequences of D-Sight images acquired from inspections of Polish military aircraft in the period from 2002 to 2017. The proposed method represents an effective tool for monitoring hidden corrosion growth in metallic aircraft structures based on a sequence of D-Sight images.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据