4.4 Article

The radio source in Abell 980: A Detached-Double-Double Radio Galaxy?

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2022.30

关键词

galaxies; active; galaxies; jets; Galaxies; clusters; individual; Abell 980; Radio continuum; general

资金

  1. Indian National Science Academy
  2. INSPIRE Faculty Scheme of DST, Govt. of India [IF-12/PH-44]
  3. Bhartratna JRD Tata Gunwant Sanshodhak Shishyavruti Yojna
  4. ASI-INAF [2017-14-H.0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent observations from LoTSS-2 at 144 MHz provide new evidence to support the hypothesis that the radio emission of cluster Abell 980 mainly comes from two double radio sources. The study explains the formation process of these sources and the effect of galaxy drift on one of them.
It is argued that the new morphological and spectral information gleaned from the recently published LoFAR Two metre Sky Survey data release 2 (LoTSS-2 at 144 MHz) observations of the cluster Abell 980 (A980), in combination with its existing GMRT and VLA observations at higher frequencies, provide the much-needed evidence to strengthen the proposal that the cluster's radio emission comes mainly from two double radio sources, both produced by the brightest cluster galaxy (BCG) in two major episodes of jet activity. The two radio lobes left from the previous activity have become diffuse and developed an ultra-steep radio spectrum while rising buoyantly through the confining hot intra-cluster medium (ICM) and, concomitantly, the host galaxy has drifted to the cluster centre and entered a new active phase manifested by a coinciding younger double radio source. The new observational results and arguments presented here bolster the case that the old and young double radio sources in A980 conjointly represent a 'double-double' radio galaxy whose two lobe pairs have lost colinearity due to the (lateral) drift of their parent galaxy, making this system by far the most plausible case of a 'Detached-Double-Double Radio Galaxy' (dDDRG).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据