4.4 Article

Isolation of a novel alginate lyase-producing Bacillus litoralis strain and its potential to ferment Sargassum horneri for biofertilizer

期刊

MICROBIOLOGYOPEN
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 1038-1049

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mbo3.387

关键词

alginate oligosaccharide; Bacillus litoralis; biofertilizer; fermentation; Sargassum horneri

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Project of Weihai [2010-3-96]
  2. National Key Technology R&D Program of China [2013BAB01B0]
  3. Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-EW-STS-060]
  4. Young Scientists Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China [41401285]
  5. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Estuarine and Coastal Research [SKLEC-KF201412]
  6. Public Science and Technology Research Funds Projects of Ocean [201505022]
  7. Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Pilot Project [XDA1102040300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Algae have long been used to augment plant productivity through their beneficial effects. Alginate oligosaccharide is believed to be one of the important components to enhance growth and crop yield. In this study, we isolated and characterized a Bacillus litoralis strain, named Bacillus M3, from decayed kelps. We further demonstrated that the M3 strain could secrete alginate lyase to degrade alginate. The crude enzyme exhibited the highest activity (33.74 U/mg) at pH 7.0 and 50 degrees C. The M3 strain was also able to ferment the brown alga Sargassum horneri. Fermentation results revealed that a fermentation period of 8-12hr was the best harvest time with the highest level of alginate oligosaccharides. Plant growth assay showed that the seaweed fermentation extract had an obvious promotion effect on root and seedling growth of Lycopersicon eseulentum L. Our results suggest that fermentation extract of Sargassum horneri by the novel strain of Bacillus litoralis M3 has significant development potential for biofertilizer production and agriculture application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据