4.6 Article

Quantifying the Relation between Activity Pattern Complexity and Car Use Using a Partial Least Square Structural Equation Model

期刊

SUSTAINABILITY
卷 14, 期 19, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/su141912101

关键词

trip chaining; mode choice; structural equation modelling; multi-day survey; workplace relocation

资金

  1. FNR (Fonds National de la Recherche) through the AFR [7951609]
  2. EU Marie Curie Career Integration Grant [618234]
  3. EU-FEDER project MERLIN [2017-03-021-18]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the relationship between activity pattern complexity and car use. The findings suggest that the number of activities chained to commuting travels strongly impact mode choice, particularly car use. The study highlights the importance of considering other daily activities in planning and management solutions aimed at reducing car use.
This paper studies the relationship between activity pattern complexity and car use using two multi-day surveys involving the same participants but collected just before and about one year after they relocated their workplace. Measurable characteristics related to two latent variables, namely activity pattern complexity, or trip chaining (e.g., number of activities done within and outside the home-work tour), and to car use (e.g., usage rate, distance travelled by car) were selected. The study shows that the methodology adopted, partial least square structural equation modelling, quantifies the relation between the two variables, and is robust towards changes in important contextual characteristics of the individuals, namely workplace location. The findings indicate that the number of activities chained to commuting travels strongly impact mode choice and, in particular, car use. The paper also shows that chaining non-work-related activities has a stronger impact on car use. The results of this study suggest that planning and management solutions aimed at reducing car use, but focusing only on the commuting trip while neglecting the impact of other daily activities, may be less effective than expected.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据