4.2 Review

A REVIEW STUDY ON FACTORS AFFECTING THE STABILITY OF NANOFLUIDS

期刊

HEAT TRANSFER RESEARCH
卷 53, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

BEGELL HOUSE INC

关键词

nanofluid; stability; surfactants; ultrasonication; surface modification

资金

  1. Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey [119N727]
  2. University of Tabriz
  3. Iran Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) [99-24-800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study comprehensively reviews the research on nanofluid stability. The study finds that parameters such as acidity level, nanoparticle material, ultrasonication, surfactants, base fluid type, nanoparticle concentration, and surface modification of nanoparticles all have important effects on nanofluid stability.
Nanofluids are suspensions of nanoparticles in a base fluid. Nanofluids that have improved thermophysical properties can be used in different applications including cooling of electronic elements, engine cooling, heat transferring in heat exchanger devices, solar water heating, domestic refrigerator-freezers, space heating, air conditioning, and many other applications. On the other hand, however, instability in nanofluids is an important obstacle to their widespread use in different energy fields. In this study, a number of research related to nanofluid stability have been comprehensively reviewed to investigate the effects of various parameters on nanofluid stability. In general, little interest has been obtained in investigating the effect of different parameters simultaneously on the stability of nanofluids. Acidity degree of the nanofluid, nanoparticles material, ultrasonication, surfactants, base fluid type, nanoparticle concentration, and surface modification of nanoparticles are among the most important technologies that are intended to increase the stability of nanofluids. This study can be considered as a useful reference for addressing the long-term stability and production of high-quality nanofluids, which is an essential demand in the field of nanofluids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据