4.6 Article

Filling- and interaction-modulated pairing symmetry in twisted bilayer graphene

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 106, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.106.115436

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fundamental Re-search Funds for the Central Universities
  2. Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation
  3. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China
  4. [B210202149]
  5. [BK20190137]
  6. [12074156]
  7. [12104232]
  8. [22075068]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene and develops a unified theoretical framework for electron-phonon coupling. Using experimental results as verification, the strongest superconductivity is found near the moire band filling factor of approximately 2. The pairing symmetry is strongly dependent on the filling factor, with different pairing states appearing in sequence.
Superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene has attracted much attention in recent years. Based on the significant experimental facts, there are many theoretical investigations on its superconducting mechanism and pairing symmetry. In this paper, we study the theory of the electron-phonon coupling in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene starting from the work of Lian et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 257002 (2019)] and thereby develop a uniform framework for the low as well as high electron densities. From this beneficial approach, we obtain the strongest superconductivity near the moire band filling factor |nu | approximate to 2, consistent with the experimental results. By associating it with the Coulomb interaction, we find that the pairing symmetry is strongly dependent on the filling factor, with the p-wave, f -wave, and s-wave pairing states sequentially appearing. It can be confirmed that the superconductivity mostly exists near the half filling of the lowest flat bands with an f-wave pairing symmetry. We discuss the possible origin of these phenomena, the stability of the superconductivity, and also the feasible experimental verification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据