4.1 Article

Condorodus n. gen., a new Ordovician conodont genus from Argentina: origin, evolution and dispersal through the western margin of Gondwana

期刊

COMPTES RENDUS PALEVOL
卷 21, 期 34, 页码 747-769

出版社

ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.5852/cr-palevol2022v21a34

关键词

Condorodus; conodonts; Ordovician; Argentina; new genus; new species

资金

  1. CONICET [PIP 2014 0058CO]
  2. International Geoscience Program (IGCP) Project -The onset of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event [653]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new genus of conodonts called Condorodus is identified in several Argentinian basins during the Ordovician period. Three species within this genus are recognized based on differences in P elements. The Eastern Cordillera is considered the place of origin of the Condorodus genus, which later dispersed through the western margin of Gondwana and reached the Precordillera.
Ordovician conodont collections from several Argentinian basins including the Eastern Cordillera, Famatina and Precordillera allow recognition of a group of conodonts that comprise a new genus here named Condorodus n. gen. Species of this genus have an apparatus composed of six elements recovered so far: Pa, Pb, Sb1, Sb2, Sc and Sd. The differences mainly between the P elements support recognizing three species, from the older to younger: C. diablensis n. gen., n. sp., C. gracielae n. gen., n. sp. and C. chilcaensis n. gen., n. sp., that appeared in the upper Floian (Lower Ordovician) and vanished in middle Darriwilian time (Middle Ordovician). The Eastern Cordillera is here assumed as the place of origin of the Condorodus n. gen. lineage during the late Floian, and then this genus dispersed through the western margin of Gondwana, reaching the Precordillera in the early Darriwilian, from there it could have dispersed to different regions of Gondwana, Perigondwana and Laurentia during the late Darriwilian, and probably give rise to conodont apparatuses of similar morphology in the Late Ordovician.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据