3.8 Proceedings Paper

The on-ground data reduction and calibration pipeline for SO/PHI-HRT

出版社

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2629323

关键词

Solar Orbiter; space observatory; solar physics; spectropolarimetry; data pipelines; data processing; image processing

资金

  1. ESA SOC team
  2. ESA MOC team
  3. BMWi through DLR central fund
  4. BMWi through MPG central fund
  5. FEDER/AEI/MCIU [RTI2018-096886-C5]
  6. Center of Excellence Severo Ochoa award [SEV-2017-0709]
  7. Ramon y Cajal fellowship
  8. CNES

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ESA/NASA Solar Orbiter successfully launched in February 2020, carrying the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (SO/PHI) instrument. This instrument utilizes differential imaging of polarized light emitted by the Sun to deduce the photospheric magnetic field and line-of-sight velocity. The article presents the architecture of the on-ground pipeline for HRT, which can reduce raw images to the full Stokes vector with a polarimetric sensitivity of 10(-3).I-c or better.
The ESA/NASA Solar Orbiter space mission has been successfully launched in February 2020. Onboard is the Polarimetric and Helioseismic Imager (SO/PHI), which has two telescopes, a High Resolution Telescope (HRT) and the Full Disc Telescope (FDT). The instrument is designed to infer the photospheric magnetic field and line-of-sight velocity through differential imaging of the polarised light emitted by the Sun. It calculates the full Stokes vector at 6 wavelength positions at the Fe I 617.3 nm absorption line. Due to telemetry constraints, the instrument nominally processes these Stokes profiles onboard, however when telemetry is available, the raw images are downlinked and reduced on ground. Here the architecture of the on-ground pipeline for HRT is presented, which also offers additional corrections not currently available on board the instrument. The pipeline can reduce raw images to the full Stokes vector with a polarimetric sensitivity of 10(-3).I-c or better.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据