3.8 Article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of commercial demulsifiers based on polyoxyalkylated compounds in relation to oil and water emulsions of the Sarybulak oilfield

期刊

出版社

AL-FARABI KAZAKH NATL UNIV
DOI: 10.15328/cb1282

关键词

oil emulsion; chemical demulsification; water-in-oil emulsion; dewatering of crude oil emulsion; heavy oils

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water and oil emulsion formation is a natural process during oil recovery and processing. This study investigates the chemical composition of crude oil and the effectiveness of demulsifiers in separating water-in-oil emulsions. The results suggest that the solubility number of the demulsifiers plays a crucial role in improving the separation efficiency and dewatering mechanism of the emulsions.
Water and oil emulsion formation is a natural process that takes place during oil recovery and processing. Heavy oils of Kazakhstan form highly stable oil emulsions mostly stabilized by a high content of asphaltenes, resins, and other surface-active components. Oil-in-water emulsions initiate the corrosion of equipment and cause transportation issues. Dewatering of oil emulsions is economically reasonable and requires universal techniques which could be applied to any sort of oil. In this study, the chemical composition of crude oil from the Sarybulak oilfield was determined, and commercial demulsifiers of Basorol brand were applied to these water-in-oil emulsions. The natural stabilizers content (asphaltenes and resins) was determined and correlated with IR-spectrum data. Finally, the effectiveness of demulsifiers is compared and explained according to their structures. It has been found that the higher the relative solubility number of the demulsifier, the better water-in-oil emulsion separation efficiency and dewatering mechanism was assumed. Results of water separation showed that Basorol PE-1040 0 and PE-1050 0 are the most effective, with DE of 96% and 91%, respectively, for 30% (vol.) water-in-oil emulsion at 60??C during 1-hour treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据