4.6 Article

Ultrathin 2D silver sulphate nanosheets for visible-light-driven NO2 sensing at room temperature

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 10, 期 42, 页码 16108-16115

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2tc03045d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Albaha University
  2. Australian Research Council (ARC) [DE190100100]
  3. ARC [CE170100039]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE190100100] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, two-dimensional layered-like silver sulphate nanosheets were successfully prepared via a combined annealing-exfoliation process, and their potential application in optoelectronic gas sensors was discovered.
Two-dimensional (2D) semiconductors, derived from the layered bulk crystals, have been attracting considerable interest due to their atomically thin structures that lead to unique electronic, optical, and surface properties. However, many important semiconductors, such as noble metal chalcogenides and their derivatives, are difficult to directly exfoliate down to the 2D ultrathin morphology given their non-layered crystal structures. Herein, we realise 2D layered-like silver sulphate (Ag2SO4) nanosheets from non-layered Ag2S via a two-step combined annealing-exfoliation process in which annealing in air converts bulk Ag2S into Ag2SO4 that is exfoliated by the strong localized mechanical force in the solvent phase. Ultrathin 2D Ag2SO4 nanosheets exhibit a strong absorption over the visible region with a direct bandgap of 1.87 eV and a prolonged exciton lifetime of 2.06 ns, which are favourable for optoelectronic gas sensing. The sensor demonstrates a room-temperature reversible response to NO2 gas at the parts per billion (ppb) level upon blue-light illumination, with a response factor of 8.39% for 160 ppb NO2 and a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.357 ppb. Such an approach can possibly be applied to a wide range of non-layered oxysulphide materials to provide a promising avenue for developing future optoelectronic gas sensors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据